September 2, 2020

(Advisory: See Update to Article, The Zika Virus Scare: An Anatomy Of How Diseases Are Manufactured For Political Objectives)

The China Syndrome 3: Caught Red-Handed

Marxist CDC And Marxist Media Caught Red-Handed [pun intended] Regurgitating Marxist Medical Science

The New England Journal of Medicine inadvertently* opens the closet on Marxist societal sabotage, outing the COVID-19 ‘pantasy’ operation to destroy the public’s health by mandating masks that weaken the immune system** and lower IQ levels:

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

Widespread anxiety didn’t just pop up into existence from nowhere, it resulted from intentional misinformation from the Marxist CDC and regurgitated by the Marxist co-opted political/media establishment. Naturally, there would be no desire for masking by the public unless the public were terrified by sociopath government agitation to be so terrified.

The PCR Test Fraud: Similarity Is Proof of Nothing When Dealing With DNA, Or Anything Else for That Matter

Kary Mullis invented the PCR non-test in 1984:

PCR detects [notice: PCR doesn’t identify a virus, it merely “detects”] a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.

See the word arbitrary? That’s because PCR primer design searches (called a query) for similarities between the known DNA sequence of one organism with that of another organism DNA sequence,*** also called the query sequence. Similarities between DNA sequences are meaningless and thereby fraught with false positive results when PCR is used for the diagnosis of a disease. In fact, the BLAST program cannot guarantee the optimal alignments of the query and database sequences as the Smith-Waterman algorithm does; it should be noted the farcical notion of the Smith-Waterman algorithm offering ‘high optimality’ for similarities! An oxymoron if one ever existed!

Now imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification! Yeah, just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching requiring only similarities?! Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations! Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test.

A pathogen’s genome is unique (that is, the complete DNA/RNA structure of the pathogen), while similar nucleotide sections can be successfully matched anywhere along a nucleotide section with base pairing primers. Similarity in nucleotide sequences does not equal ‘precisely the same genome’.

The PCR is an amplification tool, not an identity - diagnostic - tool. When used as a 'test' it can only match similar nucleotide sequences for the 'test' sample with a database of nucleotide sequences. Again, see the word 'similar'? Nucleotide sequences for even relatively small viruses are all similar! That's why when the PRC amplification is notched up from 35X amplification to 60x amplification, the positivity rate jumps from around 5% to 100%!

In other words, a diagnosis must first be established to identify the pathogen, which can only be accomplished by a blood culture, then after the pathogen is identified, one can use the PCR for treatment. Anything less is defined as misdiagnosis, which will either maim or kill the patient, explaining why so many elderly (who are prone to have underlying health issues) are dying--from medical malpractice:

We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”[3]

And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:

I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.

This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2.

-------------------------
* In an embarrassing backtracking that contradicted their April 1 article, three of the five authors wrote (click 'Letters'):

We understand that some people are citing our Perspective article (published on April 1 at NEJM.org)1 as support for discrediting widespread masking. In truth, the intent of our article was to push for more masking, not less.

Yes, one can plainly read from the April 1 article the physicians were pushing for more mask wearing:

The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

In the April 1 backtracking, the authors now say COVID-19 transmission no longer requires symptomatic conditions of up to 30 minutes, but merely being presymptomatic or asymptomatic can cause infection:   

It is apparent that many people with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or presymptomatic yet highly contagious and that these people account for a substantial fraction of all transmissions.2,3 Universal masking helps to prevent such people from spreading virus-laden secretions, whether they recognize that they are infected or not.

And what do the quacks cite as the reason for their reversal on transmission venue? Why, a study that detected destroyed virions' RNA from symptomatic subjects; the study doesn't mention presymptomatic or asymptomatic:

Abstract

We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals.

Firstly, notice the word could. That tells us we’re being treated to a scientific fraud, as the paragraph so informs us. The authors (who should have their medical licenses taken for gross scientific fraud) tell us with a straight face that they located “influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols…” They’ve just informed us that they obtained destroyed viral pieces (RNA), without envelops. That is they found non-infectious viral matter, since in order to be infectious the virion needs to have its envelop in order to infect a host cell! Yeah, the medical quacks are counting on your ignorance to not know the critical difference between RNA fragments that can’t infect and an enveloped virion that can infect. 

Additionally, the quacks tell us, “…with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets”, which is precisely what one would expect from droplets, most of which still have their envelops. For those symptomatic, the less virion concentrated aerosols are significantly decreased of infectious virions by mucus and saliva, where in the case of those who are merely asymptomatic or presymptomatic, the virions are totally wiped out by mucus or saliva long before their RNA exit the nose or mouth.  

As irony would have it, thanks to the backtracking Letter, we’re informed of the powerful antiviral properties of saliva and mucus for those who are symptomatic. For those who are presymptomatic or asymptomatic, where viral load is a fraction of those who are symptomatic, saliva and mucus easily destroys completely those relatively few virions before they can be exhaled by the mouth or nose, explaining why the CDC informs us that respiratory-related viral infections can only be spread via symptomatic coughs and sneezes:

The Science of Respiratory Related Viral Transmission Per The CDC, Thereby Informing No COVID-19 Exists

(1) Common Cold:

How to Protect Others

If you have a cold, you should follow these tips to help prevent spreading it to other people:

Stay at home while you are sick and keep children out of school or daycare while they are sick.

Avoid close contact with others, such as hugging, kissing, or shaking hands.

Move away from people before coughing or sneezing.

Cough and sneeze into a tissue then throw it away, or cough and sneeze into your upper shirt sleeve, completely covering your mouth and nose.

Wash your hands after coughing, sneezing, or blowing your nose.

Disinfect frequently touched surfaces and objects, such as toys and doorknobs.

Talking and breathing does not transmit the common cold. 

(2) Polio: 

Transmission

Poliovirus is very contagious and spreads through person-to-person contact.

It lives in an infected person’s throat and intestines.

Poliovirus only infects people. It enters the body through the mouth and spreads through:

Contact with the feces (poop) of an infected person.

Droplets from a sneeze or cough of an infected person (less common).

You can get infected with poliovirus if:

You have feces on your hands, and you touch your mouth.

You put in your mouth objects like toys that are contaminated with feces.

One can only catch this "very contagious disease" from coughing or sneezing, or contact with feces, not talking or breathing.

(3) Smallpox: 

Prevent Spread of Disease

Smallpox is spread through prolonged face-to-face contact via droplets expelled from the patient’s nose and mouth, usually by coughing. Smallpox may also be transmitted through contact with materials from smallpox pustules or scabs. There have also been rare reports of airborne transmission in hospital and laboratory settings. Prevent the spread of disease within your facility and from your facility to the community by adhering to infection and environmental controls.

Smallpox isn't spread via talking and breathing.

(4) Measles: 

Measles is a highly contagious virus that lives in the nose and throat mucus of an infected person. It can spread to others through coughing and sneezing. Also, measles virus can live for up to two hours in an airspace where the infected person coughed or sneezed.

If other people breathe the contaminated air or touch the infected surface, then touch their eyes, noses, or mouths, they can become infected. Measles is so contagious that if one person has it, up to 90% of the people close to that person who are not immune will also become infected.”

Infected people can spread measles to others from four days before through four days after the rash appears.

Measles isn't spread via talking and breathing, either.

(5) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

RSV can spread when an infected person coughs or sneezes. You can get infected if you get droplets from the cough or sneeze in your eyes, nose, or mouth, or if you touch a surface that has the virus on it, like a doorknob, and then touch your face before washing your hands. Additionally, it can spread through direct contact with the virus, like kissing the face of a child with RSV.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection isn’t spread via talking or breathing. 

** Germs are a necessary part of a healthy immune system, helping our body's defenses beef up and fight future illnesses. When a person's exposure to germs is decreased, problems may arise.

…

Researchers studied two kinds of mice: One group had been exposed to a normal bacteria environment, and another group that was germ-free. When scientists compared the immune systems of the two groups of mice, they found what they cited as evidence to support the hygiene hypothesis – the mice that had been exposed to microbes had stronger immune systems than the germ-free mice.

Additionally, the germ-free mice had exaggerated inflammation in their lungs and colon, similar to what is seen in humans who have asthma and ulcerative colitis. The researchers found that a particular kind of immune cell, called an invariant natural killer T cell, was particularly hyperactive in these mice.

…

The researchers only investigated mice, not people, but experts said the biologic mechanism they studied was similar in both rodents and humans.

*** Programs such as BLAST or FASTA locate the similar nucleotide sequences from a databank of DNA sequences.