Wednesday, April 6, 2016

(Updated June 5, 2022*

Updated August 9, 2022)

The Zika Virus Scare: An Anatomy Of How Diseases

Are Manufactured For Political Objectives

--------------------------------------

Abstract

In 2014, under a non-reporting requirement regime, Brazilian physicians reported a fraction of microcephaly cases for that year; 147 cases to be exact. Under the new reporting regime that took over for 2015, the number of cases naturally increased massively, the numbers representing what would be expected under a reporting regime. Then using the artificially low 2014 numbers as the baseline, Brazil and the global political/medical community (though not all within the medical community) declared an epidemic of microcephaly in Brazil based on the higher, though expected, numbers under the new reporting requirement regime.

"It's a global scandal. Brazil has created a worldwide panic." - Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, professor of epidemiology at the University of Sao Paulo
                                                                                         ----------------------------------------

"In 2014, only about 150 cases [of microcephaly] were reported in Brazil1 in a year — a surprisingly small amount for a large country with nearly 3 million births a year. The United States, with about 4 million births a year, has an estimated 2,500 cases of microcephaly a year, said Margaret Honein, a CDC epidemiologist."

The small number of microcephaly cases reported in Brazil before 2015 is being used to set the stage for a blatantly orchestrated 'epidemic' not only in Brazil but around the globe. Pre-2015, cases of microcephaly in Brazil were massively undercounted, as inadvertently confirmed by the World Health Organization's (WHO) statistics...

"Microcephaly is a rare condition. One baby in several thousand is born with microcephaly."
Using the one baby in several thousand criteria WHO provides for the occurrence of microcephaly every year, then Brazil should have been reporting at least 1,000 cases per year (3 million/3000 = 1,000), not 150 cases. This explains why under closer examination the numbers in Brazil are declining from the truly high count of 4,180 cases of microcephaly initially reported,² where of the more than 700 cases under review only 270 cases confirm microcephaly, ruling out the 462 other cases.

If one uses the United States' statistics of one baby in 1,600 born with microcephaly per year (4 million/2,500), Brazil should be reporting approximately 1,875 cases (3 million/1600) of microcephaly every year, a number that is showing up with the new Brazil count, where 0.3857% of the 700 cases under examination were shown to have microcephaly. So let's do the math:

    0.3857 x 4,180 = 1,612 

1,612 is only 263 less than the 1,875 cases of microcephaly one would expect to see every year in Brazil if the American incidence of the disease (1 in 1600) were also true in Brazil. This undercounting in Brazil has been observed by experts in the medical community, and termed a scandal, "It's a global scandal. Brazil has created a worldwide panic," said Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Sao Paulo, one of the most-respected universities in Latin America. "I'm not saying that Zika is not causing microcephaly, but I am saying that the ministry has yet to present any scientifically credible evidence to support that conclusion." Ganeshwaran H. Mochida, a pediatric neurologist and researcher at Boston Children's Hospital, also sounds the alarm, "It is possible that the baseline number in Brazil includes a lot of underreporting."

Firstly, it's the global community, not just Brazil, that's playing fast and loose with the fake Zika virus epidemic, and secondly, there never was a reason to believe that Brazil was suffering an epidemic of microcephaly in the first place, since it was well known that pre-2015 Brazilian doctors only reported a small fraction of such cases to the central government; pre-2015 there existed no reporting requirement for microcephaly in Brazil. The sudden emergence in 2015 of an 'epidemic' of microcephaly in Brazil actually represents numbers that would be expected given a comprehensive reporting requirement.

So why the scare, you ask? To create public pressure to scale back restrictive abortion laws in central and south America, and undo state restrictions on abortion in the United States, as inadvertently admitted to by Georgetown University professors and Planned Parenthood and Newsweek.

This news item illustrates the extent of the lies the Marxist co-opted media regurgitates each and every week, if not every day. How numerous are fraudulent news items when compared against truthful news items? My blog has proven that until one has verified  the news for oneself, one must assume all news to be lies. Of course most persons have actual lives to live, where the demands of family and employment preclude close examination of the news. For those too pressed for independent research, this blog fills the gap.

Notice too the 'alternative' media's spin on the news item. Every imaginable conspiracy theory is offered, leaving unmentioned the easily discernible conspiracy facts. This false opposition tactic is what Marxists call the ‘Scissors Strategy’ in which the blades represent the two falsely opposed sides that converge on the confused victims, neutralizing true opposition to socialism, thereby allowing the advancement of socialism to the bewilderment of the true opposition.

The Lancet's French Polynesia Study

The Lancet study’s research design lacks alternative time periods to compare with the time period the study uses (the study uses a twenty-three month period, Sept 1, 2013 to July 31, 2015).³ That means that any conclusions the study makes are useless, since we don’t know the microcephaly incidence for alternative twenty-three month time periods. What we have then is a research study that tells us nothing regarding the incidence of microcephaly in French Polynesia circa 2014.

The Abortion Agenda's Purpose

Thanks to the blatant lies the CDC has advanced regarding the Zika virus and microcephaly, we now have further empirical proof for the Marxist co-option of the West (globe actually, the West leaving behind Marxist regimes in their former colonies), where abortion is used to destroy the Christian underpinnings of Western Civilization. As Marx said in the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right(1843)⁴...

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

The West cannot remain Christian for long when abortion is tolerated, since Christian dogma teaches us that human life is but a continuation of a previous non-corporeal existence...

"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you..."

To destroy what's in the womb is a must for Marxists, since with abortion on demand no one can long continue to believe in a God who knew us before we were born into the physical realm.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  To be precise, Brazilian doctors reported 147 cases of microcephaly in 2014.

2. Current figures from Brazil place total potential cases of microcephaly in 2015 at 6,480, where it’s expected that 39% of those cases will be confirmed microcephaly, or approximately 2,500 cases.

3. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–15: a retrospective study

4. The 'War on Religion' as set out in Karl Marx's Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

...and...

"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."

...and...

"It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Sunday, June 5, 2022

The Virus Fraud: An Anatomy Of How A Pathogen

Was Manufactured For Political Objectives

“I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ -- Professor Andreas Podbielski, Virologist, University of Rostock, as quoted in his expert witness testimony at the 2014 'Measels trial' at the Ravensburg Local Court.

The defendant, Dr. Stefan Lanka, responds to the shocking admission of a virologist that viruses don't exist:

"Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity."

"1. The fact of Alignment

Virologists have never isolated a complete 

genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly, 

in its entire length. They always use very short 

pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists 

of four molecules to determine them and call 

them sequences. From a multitude of millions of 

such specific, very short sequences, virologists 

mentally assemble a fictitious long genome 

strand with the help of complex computational 

and statistical methods. This process is called 

alignment.

The result of this complex alignment, the 

fictitious and very long genetic strand, is 

presented by virologists as the core of a virus 

and they claim to have thus proven the 

existence of a virus. However, such a complete 

strand never appears in reality and in scientific 

literature as a whole, although the simplest 

standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis*] 

have long been available to 

determine the length and composition of nucleic 

acids simply and directly. By the fact of the 

alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid

of the appropriate length directly, the virologists 

have disproved themselves.

…

3. Alignment is only done by means 

of mental constructs

In order to be able to mentally/computationally 

assemble the very short sequences of the 

nucleic acids used into a long genome, the 

virologists need a template to align the short 

sequences into a very long, supposedly viral 

genome strand. Without such a given, very long 

sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to 

construct a viral genome 

theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue 

that the constructed genome is from a virus 

because the alignment was done with another, 

given viral genome.

This argument of the virologists is briefly and 

unambiguously refuted by the fact that all 

templates with which new genetic material 

strands were generated 

theoretically/computationally were themselves 

and finally generated 

theoretically/computationally and do not 

originate from a virus." – Dr. Stefan Lanka 

In order to identify the "virus" one needs a template that tells virology what type of virus one is dealing with. But where did virology obtain the first genome template that identifies the specific "virus" that's reassembled from millions of pieces of nucleic acids, when all templates going back decades to the first "viral" template are man-mad genome constructs? 

The virus fraud is self-identified. 

The virus fraud needs some form of confirmation, however, and accomplishes this with PCR, and other diagnostic tools, that will naturally pick up the DNA/RNA signatures of humans, not viruses:

"The other decisive fact — not just for SARS or the corona crisis —

is that virologists, by assuming the existence of pathogenic viruses,

suppress for understandable reasons an underlying truth. The

current testing method tests for the presence of a specific genetic

material. However, the genetic sequences used as a “template” for

such tests have not been isolated from a virus. Scientists isolate typical

genetic sequences released by dying cells and tissues. These

generally short genetic sequences, components of human metabolic

processes, are the foundation of the subsequent laboratory work.

With the help of computer programs, virologists “conceptually” construct

a longer RNA or DNA strand out of the many isolated shorter

genetic sequences. These constructed RNA or DNA strands are then

claimed to be real viral strands. That is the reason why so many

healthy people end up testing positive again and again." -- Dr. Stefan Lanka

And what are these "typical genetic sequences released by dying cells" if not viruses? Exosomes:

"During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform these control experiments and the result was that the tissues and cells die, due to the laboratory conditions, in the exact same way as when they come into contact with allegedly “infected” material. The entire purpose of control experiments is to exclude the possibility that it is the applied method or technique which may cause the result. Control experiments, then, are the highest duty in science and also the exclusive basis of claiming that one’s conclusion is scientific."

Exosomes were 'discovered' in 1983, but incredulously virology conspired to not ask the obvious and critical question when they were 'discovered': Since 1954, when the virus hypothesis was accepted, has virology been confusing viruses for exosomes? The fact that this critical question was never asked, and negative control experiments finally conducted on viruses, proves not only the Marxist co-option of our medical institutions, but all institutions, otherwise such a massive and pervasive fraud couldn't have been mounted, the purpose of the fraud being the Human Extinction Event we're currently experiencing with mRNA poisons:

Since vaccines are for the healthy, not the sick, then the use of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA's) for vaccines identifies the Satanist co-option of our institutions,1 knowingly releasing poisons onto humanity, otherwise, of course, no sane individual would desire to accidentally destroy humanity with a vaccine that turned out to be deadly...quod erat demonstrandum.

It's one thing to provide an EUA for those who are already sick and in imminent course for death. The patient is going to die soon, so if the patient chooses, he/she can decide to take the chance on the new potentially dangerous treatment. This scenario, however, cannot be transferred to humanity without the risk of eviscerating humanity.

** Addendum

The CDC was informed in 2010 that its vaccine reporting system only captured less than 1% of adverse events:

"...fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health."

When the CDC was informed of this scandal, "...the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation", thereby identifying the Satanist co-option of our institutions, where poisons masquerade as beneficial medical treatments. To date approximately 30,000 deaths due to COVID-19 vaccines  have been reported to CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Since less than 1% of adverse events are recorded by VAERS, that places the true COVID-19 vaccine death count at approximately 3 million. Also reported to VAERS are 249,116 serous injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 29, 2022. Since less than 1% of adverse events are recorded by VAERS, that places the true COVID-19 vaccine serious injury count at approximately 24,911,600.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Who use the more numerous Marxists as unwitting foot soldiers, both entities' objective being the "abolition of religion", and the destruction of those civilizations "whose spiritual aroma is religion":

Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)

.

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

...and...

"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."

...and...

"It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world."

Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, "The Struggle"...

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."