Wednesday, August 4, 2021

(Updated 8/16/21)

(Update 9/16/2025; see Addendum)

(Update 3/12/2026; see Addendum)

(Update 5/7/2026; see Addendum)

(Updated 5/15/2026; see Addendum)

(Updated 5/19/2026; see Addendum II)

(Advisory: See Update to Article, The Zika Virus Scare: An Anatomy Of How Diseases Are Manufactured For Political Objectives)

It's All In The Viruses, Dummy!

                     

The human virome consists of 338 trillion viruses...

It has been estimated that there are over 380 trillion viruses inhabiting us, a community collectively known as the human virome. But these viruses are not the dangerous ones you commonly hear about, like those that cause the flu or the common cold, or more sinister infections like Ebola or dengue. Many of these viruses infect the bacteria that live inside you and are known as bacteriophages, or phages for short. The human body is a breeding ground for phages, and despite their abundance, we have very little insight into what all they or any of the other viruses in the body are doing.

...that stalk and kill bacteria harmful to humans...

Here’s a few of the things we have learned thus far. Bacteria in the human body are not in love with their many phages that live in and around them. In fact they developed CRISPR-Cas systems – which humans have now co-opted for editing genes – to rid themselves of phages or to prevent phage infections altogether. Why? Because phages kill bacteria. They take over the bacteria’s machinery and force them to make more phages rather than make more bacteria. When they are done, they burst out of the bacterium, destroying it. Finally, phages sit on our body surfaces just waiting to cross paths with vulnerable bacteria. They are basically bacteria stalkers.

Although different people can have significantly different viromes, people who cohabitate appear to share about 25 percent of the viruses in their viromes. Viruses can be transmitted from one household member to the other not just through typical contagious means such as coughing but also through casual contact and sharing sinks, toilets, desks and food. Although we have only studied small numbers of people, the data show that nonromantic roommates share a similar percentage of viruses as romantic roommates do. Intimate contact seems to make little difference; just living in the same space is enough.

...thereby proving that masks, lockdowns, and manic cleansing are deadly to humans if masks, lockdowns, and manic cleansing can prevent viral spread. The fact that billions around the globe haven't fallen victim to deadly bacterial infections stemming from run-amok bacterial infections caused by masks, lockdowns, and manic cleansing proves (1) that masks, lockdowns, and manic cleansing don't impede viral transmission;* (2) there is no COVID-19; thereby (3) proving the Marxist co-option of the West's institutions peddling a fake pandemic for the purpose of the "abolition of religion", and the destruction of those civilizations "whose spiritual aroma is religion"...

Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

...and...

"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."

...and...

"It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world."

Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, The Struggle...

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*  Keeping healthy people isolated from one other simply isn’t necessary. Multiple medical authorities, including the World Health Organization, the CDC, the New England Journal of Medicine, have now all acknowledged that there is no scientific justification for normal healthy people to be wearing masks. In fact, prolonged mask-wearing actually increases the risk of disease to the wearer. People tend to touch their faces much more often when they’re wearing a mask. In addition, we end up rebreathing particles that our lungs have exhaled – whether it’s pollen, dust, virus or bacteria particles – they’re trapped in the mask, and on the very next inhale, we breath them back in. Lastly, many people are wearing masks other than surgical or medical masks, and many of them are not porous enough to allow carbon dioxide that we exhale to fully dissipate, so in every inhalation we breath back in more carbon dioxide. Furthermore, and very importantly, habitual wearing of masks decreases the body’s natural immune response. We’re supposed to come into contact regularly with foreign things – bacteria, viruses, all kinds of things – and that’s what helps to keep our immune systems on alert, working at full capacity. If you limit your exposure to everything by constantly wearing masks, or the overuse of hand sanitizers and disinfectants, your immune system in effect says, ‘apparently I’m not needed, I’ll go on vacation, take a nap’. And it won’t be prepped and ready when you need it to amount the appropriate immune response. -- Dr. Kelly Victory, M.D., Trauma and Emergency Physician, with a Specialty in Disaster Preparedness and Response and the Management of Mass Casualty.

=========================================================================================

Addendum

We start by throwing light on the neglected subject regarding the shocking breach of medical ethics regarding safety protocols for the pre-testing of vaccines. It takes 5-10 years to complete Phase III trials to ensure that the human species isn't wiped out should a general-use vaccine's adverse effects prove deadly, thereby identifying the Satanist co-option of our institutions (who use the more numerous Marxists as pawns to implement their policies*) that knew the vaccines were deadly [if a blood vessel is pricked], otherwise no non-Satanist-Marxist entity would take a chance on the annihilation of humanity should the long-term adverse effects prove deadly. Oh yes, we're currently in Year 5 of what should be Phase III.

Firstly, when pressed under oath in court, medical science is compelled to admit there is no such thing as a virus.* Secondly, medical science tells us there are no vaccines for cold viruses, the coronavirus, and RSV, being a cold virus.** Thirdly, if a blood vessel is pricked receiving a jab, where the needle wasn't aspirated, that means, in the case of the COVID-19 "vaccines", the nanoparticles carrying the mRNA have entered the bloodstream, and will now enter the cells of organs throughout the body,*** and being a foreign element within those cells, the immune system destroys the cells, leading to organ damage and/or subsequent death, the severity of the outcome depending on if the syringe carried a full mRNA load, or if its contents was merely saline.

This is why in 2017 the CDC and WHO alerted the medical community there was no longer a need to aspirate a needle, preventing the contents of the syringe from entering a blood vessel...

"Aspiration before injection of vaccines or toxoids (i.e., pulling back on the syringe plunger after needle insertion but before injection) is not necessary because no large blood vessels are present at the recommended injection sites, and a process that includes aspiration might be more painful for infants (22)."

"...no large blood vessels"? The smallest blood vessels are measured in millionths of a meter (um), while nanoparticles that carry the mRNA are measured in billionths of a meter (nm). That's called premeditated murder, identifying the Marxist co-option of our institutions. 

A lipid nanoparticle's (LNP) diameter can range from 10 - 1000 nanometers (nm). The diameter of the lipid nanoparticles Pfizer-BioNTech uses for its mRNA-based vaccine has an average diameter of approximately 80–85 nm. Moderna (Spikevax) LNPs have a comparable diameter of 80–100 nm. Assuming the greatest diameter of 100 nm for the mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticle, and the smallest diameter of 5 um for a  capillary blood vessel:

Question to Google AI: How many 100 nm sized objects can enter a hole the size of 5 um? "AI Overview Approximately 2,267 spherical objects of 100 nm size can theoretically fit into a 5 um circular hole if they are arranged in a single layer using the most efficient packing method."

Let's take a look at WHO...

"Do NOT aspirate, i.e. do not pull back on the syringe after inserting in the injection site as it increases the pain:

− There are no large blood vessels at the recommended injection sites or injection into a large vessel, so no risk of major bleeding."

The PCR Diagnostic Scam and the Quest for False Positives

"5' nuclease assay specificity Assay specificity is the degree that the assay includes signal from the target and excludes signal from non-target in the results. Specificity is arguably the most important aspect of any assay. The greatest threat to assay specificity for 5' nuclease assays is homologs. Homologs are genes similar in sequence to that of the target, but they are not the intended target of the assay. Homologs are extremely common within species and across related species.

...

5' nuclease assays offer two tools for specificity: primers and probes. For maximal impact on specificity by primers, a mismatch between the target and homolog must be positioned at the 3' -most base of the primer. A mismatch further away from the 3’ end may have little to no impact on specificity. In contrast, mismatches across most of the length of a MGB probe, which is shorter than a TaqMan® probe, can have a strong impact on specificity—TaqMan® MGB probes are stronger tools for specificity than primers.

For example, a one or two-base random mismatch in the primer binding site will very likely allow the DNA polymerase to extend the primer bound to the homolog with high efficiency. A one or two base extension by DNA polymerase will stabilize the primer bound to the homolog, so it is just as stably bound as primer bound to the intended, fully complementary target. At that point, there is nothing to prevent the DNA polymerase from continuing synthesis to produce a copy of the homolog."

Homolog is an errant target genome the primer has latched onto in order to duplicate, duplication numbers depending on the number of cycles used.

When the above was written in 2012, medical science only tested when one was sick with symptoms, this protocol being SOP because mass testing would naturally lead to massive false positives, precisely why one-hundred years of medical science was turned on its head overnight by the self-identified Satanist establishment.

Of course, also turned on its head was the use of PCR for diagnostics that had been going on before 2019. At the bottom of every odd numbered page, Life Technologies warns...

"For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures."

------------------

* “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ -- Professor Andreas Podbielski, University of Rostock, 2015, giving expert testimony on the existence of viruses at Ravensburg Local Court. 

 As Dr. Lanka observes:

"Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity."

Now, for the real shocker: How a virus is manufactured piecemeal, not captured whole...

"1. The fact of Alignment

Virologists have never isolated a complete 

genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly, 

in its entire length. They always use very short 

pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists 

of four molecules to determine them and call 

them sequences. From a multitude of millions of 

such specific, very short sequences, virologists 

mentally assemble a fictitious long genome 

strand with the help of complex computational 

and statistical methods. This process is called 

alignment.

The result of this complex alignment, the 

fictitious and very long genetic strand, is 

presented by virologists as the core of a virus 

and they claim to have thus proven the 

existence of a virus. However, such a complete 

strand never appears in reality and in scientific 

literature as a whole, although the simplest 

standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis] 

have long been available to 

determine the length and composition of nucleic 

acids simply and directly. By the fact of the 

alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid

of the appropriate length directly, the virologists 

have disproved themselves.

…

3. Alignment is only done by means 

of mental constructs

In order to be able to mentally/computationally 

assemble the very short sequences of the 

nucleic acids used into a long genome, the 

virologists need a template to align the short 

sequences into a very long, supposedly viral 

genome strand. Without such a given, very long 

sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to 

construct a viral genome 

theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue 

that the constructed genome is from a virus 

because the alignment was done with another, 

given viral genome.

This argument of the virologists is briefly and 

unambiguously refuted by the fact that all 

templates with which new genetic material 

strands were generated 

theoretically/computationally were themselves 

and finally generated 

theoretically/computationally and do not 

originate from a virus." – Dr. Stefan Lanka 

...and...

...and...

{ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OGuWWI5aHE&t=8s ]

Virologists conspire to not capture whole viral sequences via Agarose Gel Electrophoresis (1973) or Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (1984) because the sequences would identify human DNA/RNA within Exosomes. If virologists were to use whole DNA/RNA fully captured by Gel Electrophoresis (1973), or the more robust Pulse-field Gel Electrophoresis (1984), the DNA/RNA contents would be recognized as human DNA/RNA residing in exocomes, not viruses. This is why the COVID-19 "vaccine" is dangerous, because the RNA-based sequence used for the mRNA "vaccine" is a foreign protein derived from alignment sequences deposited into computer mainframe data banks:

Question to Google AI: Do virologists use alignment to create the RNA sequence that is used for the spike protein?

AI Overview

Yes, virologists and vaccine designers use sequence alignment as a fundamental, early step to create the optimized RNA sequences used for the spike protein in mRNA vaccines. [1, 2]

...and foreign proteins that invade cells activate the immune system to destroy the invaded cells, such as heart cells or the inside lining of vascular cells, resulting in myocarditis and pericarditis in the former, and massive clogging in the latter. 

** "What's Causing My Cold?  

...  

Here are a few of the most common cold viruses.

Rhinovirus. Doctors have found three different types and at least 169 different strains of rhinovirus around the globe. It's most active in early fall, spring, and summer. Rhinoviruses cause 10%-40% of colds. You'll feel miserable when you catch one, but they rarely make you seriously sick.

Coronavirus. This group of viruses is common in people and animals. They were discovered in the 1960s. Some kinds only cause mild cold symptoms, but a newer kind, SARS-CoV-2, causes COVID-19. A coronavirus strain is most likely to cause your cold in the winter and early spring. 

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This virus is so common that most kids have it by the time they turn 2 years old. While RSV symptoms are often mild, they can get severe enough that you'll need to go to the hospital."



"Why Is There No Vaccine for the Common Cold?

...........

Research and Vaccine Development

Research on the development of a common cold vaccine suggests that a vaccine for the common cold is not likely in the near future.

A study that compiled past and present research on the development of a rhinovirus vaccine noted that:7

It will be difficult to develop the vaccine because rhinovirus infects quickly and mutates, or changes, quickly.

In clinical trials that tested a cold vaccine with just one strain, results showed that it was not protective.

In clinical trials that focused on a cold vaccine with 10 strains, results also found it to be ineffective.


If a cold vaccine does get developed, it will likely need to provide broad protection against many strains of rhinovirus."


*** Instead of entering muscle cells in the deltoid region.

Addendum II

"AI Overview

In late 1918 and 1919, US public health researcher Dr. Milton J. Rosenau conducted famous experiments to prove how the Spanish Flu spread. Despite having volunteers share handshakes, breathe air from patients, and even have patients cough directly into their faces, the transmission tests universally failed, with zero volunteers falling ill.

These failed transmission tests occurred due to several key factors:

Unknown Etiology: At the time, viruses were not yet discovered, and it was mistakenly believed that the flu was caused by a bacteria (such as Pfeiffer's bacillus). The researchers were actually trying to transmit a bacterial proxy rather than the unidentified viral agent.

Prior Immunity: Many volunteers may have already had cross-reactive immunity from a prior, milder wave of the flu earlier in the spring of 1918.

Improper Timing: The patients chosen for the experiments might have been in the late, less-transmissible stages of the illness.

Small Sample Sizes: The studies involved very limited cohorts (e.g., only 10 volunteers in the primary experiment) and featured methodology that was crude compared to modern standards.

While the 1918 flu was historically recorded as a highly virulent and deadly pathogen, epidemiological models have since revealed it was actually only moderately transmissible person-to-person in a general setting, spreading much like other historical influenza strains.

To read more about why this disease spread despite these early clinical failures, review the historical records on The Deadliest Flu: The Complete Story of the Discovery."

Notice what Google AI - and by extension the science of virology - failed to hypothesize:

(1) Germ theory doesn't exist.

...and for today...

(2) Viruses don't exist,* as admitted by:

I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value. -- Professor Andreas Podbielski, University of Rostock, 2015, giving expert testimony on the existence of viruses at Ravensburg Local Court.

As Dr. Stefan Lanka observes:

Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.

What Google AI choose no to relay:

In case these ten navy volunteers were somehow immune, though unlikely as they had no prior influenza exposure, the study recruited another set of 50 volunteers. They repeat the experiment with influenza patients from another outbreak location, but could not prove human-to-human transmission. And, intriguingly, one physician involved in the study contracted influenza.

So, what was the 1918 "influenza":

(1) the result of four-years of chemical warfare in Europe/Russia, where trace amounts of toxic gasses spread worldwide; and

(2) in 1917 the patent on aspirin lapsed, resulting in the widespread use of aspirin during the "pandemic", where dosages were in many cases toxic, leading to pulmonary edema.

============
* Then the robust scientific studies proving germ theory is a Marxist establishment hoax were never conducted. This is where we witness the scientific method buried six feet under.

ReplyForward Add reaction