Supplemental Article



Wednesday, July 1, 2020


What's That Nauseating Smell In The Air? Viral Socialism, Of Course!

For protesters in Huntington Beach, social and economic restrictions are  political; COVID-19, a 'hoax' - Los Angeles Times


Prologue


(2) Polio: 






One can only catch this "very contagious disease" from coughing or sneezing, or contact with feces, not talking or breathing.

(3) Smallpox: 




Smallpox isn't spread via talking and breathing.

(4) Measles: 

Measles is a highly contagious virus that lives in the nose and throat mucus of an infected person. It can spread to others through coughing and sneezing. Also, measles virus can live for up to two hours in an airspace where the infected person coughed or sneezed.

If other people breathe the contaminated air or touch the infected surface, then touch their eyes, noses, or mouths, they can become infected. Measles is so contagious that if one person has it, up to 90% of the people close to that person who are not immune will also become infected.

Infected people can spread measles to others from four days before through four days after the rash appears.

Measles isn't spread via talking and breathing, either.

(5) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

RSV can spread when an infected person coughs or sneezes. You can get infected if you get droplets from the cough or sneeze in your eyes, nose, or mouth, or if you touch a surface that has the virus on it, like a doorknob, and then touch your face before washing your hands. Additionally, it can spread through direct contact with the virus, like kissing the face of a child with RSV.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection isn’t spread via talking or breathing. 


Now for actual science we learned in high school biology:

When a person is non-symptomatic (not coughing/sneezing) that person can't spread a virus because saliva and mucus’ salt content is at least seven times less than that of a virus, whereby the virus explodes through its uncontrolled intake of saliva and mucus’ water. Only symptomatic (coughing or sneezing) persons can infect, where whole viruses are ejected from the lungs. Most of those viruses from the lungs still have their protein envelops that allows entry into host cells. Otherwise, viruses exhaled by mere breathing or talking are long destroyed by saliva and mucus, explaining why studies only find RNA debris in the environment from infected when the infected are only breathing or talking. No whole viruses are ever detected in the environment.

Coughs And Sneezes Spreads Diseases

In coordination with the Marxist COVID-19 operation that has been used to destroy the West's economies, several 'studies' came out that for the first time in history told us that even breathing and talking can spread diseases, where medical science had assured us that only coughs and sneezes spread diseases, as per the facts that (1) during cold and flu season the streets aren't deserted (!); and (2) if mere talking and breathing spread diseases, then the human species ( or any animal species) wouldn't exist! Kind of obvious, huh? But not to Marxist Science, where the pursuit of agitation must proceed to entice the ignorant and imbeciles.

Let's take a look at one of the 'studies', as reported by Medical News Today:

"Of the 23 fine aerosol samples collected during normal breathing without coughing, the analysis showed that 11 samples — or nearly half — contained detectable traces of viral RNA, including eight with infectious virus. This suggests that normal breathing is a considerable contributor to aerosol shedding of flu virus through exhaled breath.

Also, the participants did not sneeze very much, and when they did, the sneezes were not especially associated with greater presence of viral RNA, either in coarse or fine aerosol samples. This suggests that sneezing is not a big factor in aerosol shedding of flu virus through exhaled breath.

From these results, the researchers conclude that “sneezing is rare and not important for — and that coughing is not required for — influenza virus aerosolization.”'

Viruses- Structure, Replication and Diagnosis | Microbe Notes
Hmm...anyone with a superficial knowledge of the general structure of viruses (see diagram above, if not) spot the glowing lie? Firstly, however, notice the word suggests. That tells us the study left something really big out of the report.

Secondly, RNA on its own is harmless and tells us the virion was destroyed by mucus/saliva,* leaving only the RNA. In order to be infectious, the virion must have its envelop that encapsulates the RNA. It is the envelop that secures entry into a host cell,** not RNA!

The article reads, "Also, the participants did not sneeze very much, and when they did, the sneezes were not especially associated with greater presence of viral RNA..."

The subjects wouldn't be associated with greater presence of viral RNA because infectious whole viruses by the tens of thousands are being jettisoned from the lungs, not constituent RNA strands! Sneezing and coughing is how the body recovers from a viral infection, by jettisoning whole viruses that would otherwise infect new host cells; RNA doesn't infect host cells

As is apparent, the Marxist agitprop is flagrantly obvious.


Hippocratic What? 

We additionally know that we're living through a sham COVID-19 Marxist operation to destroy the economy by that physicians have set in place the injuring of individuals by taking PCR samples (or serology samples) from persons who are not symptomatic, where the PCR tests will come back false positive, at worst, due to the high contamination nature of the PCR. The PCR is useless for diagnosis because the high false positive rates for the test leads to misdiagnosis and then mistreatment.

Serology tests are likewise useless early in the game, but for another reason. There aren't much antibodies unless one is symptomatic, again leading to false positives.

PCR tests are only for treatment, due to their false positive natures, thereby preventing misdiagnosis and mistreatment. With the serology test, it is only to be administered when symptoms are present, where antibodies are now plentiful to identify, otherwise the risk of a false positive is real, where misdiagnosis and mistreatment rear their heads.



The Mask: Socialist Street Theatrics 

Let's set aside the efficacy of the false positive prone PCR test for the purpose of making an instructive point, a point of scientific fact we learned in high school biology, in fact:

What does the PCR test swab pick up in the oral/nasal cavity? Is it whole viruses? Or is it destroyed viruses, where only the RNA strand is left? As discussed above, the second choice is the answer, RNA strand, there are no whole viruses that can be consequently 100% certified with an electron microscope as the virus under investigation, and we've therefore just proven that the science we were instructed on in high school biology is the same science today (of course!), where we witness those who aren't symptomatic don't have functioning - infectious - viruses in their oral/nasal cavities, because saliva or mucus have destroyed the latent viruses; an infectious virus requires an 'outer' envelop that is the mechanism that tricks host cells into allowing the virus inside them.

So, now we know we've been lied to when told that those who aren't symptomatic (symptomatic constituting coughing/sneezing) can also spread the disease. Asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic disease carriers cannot spread ANY disease thanks to saliva and mucus' destructive power over viruses. This also tells us that no one needs to wear a mask, only those who are symptomatic, who eject directly from their lungs infectious droplets, droplets consisting in size of anywhere between 30,000 to 100,000 individual whole viruses.


(1) Medical Mask:


Picture of a surgical mask

(a) eyes will still pick up the virus.
(b) viral droplets will attach to moistened mask, infecting wearer when mask is disturbed.
(c) Individual viruses will enter through mask and peripheral openings.
(d) Increased incidence of respiratory infection.
(e) no need to wear mask if non- symptomatic; mucus and saliva destroy the latent viruses (released through talking or breathing) of the symptomatic.***


(2) N95 Mask:


N95 mask on table in front of medical worker

(a) eyes will still pick up the virus.
(b) viral droplets will enter mask, adhering to electrically charged fibers, but individual viruses will break off the droplets infecting the wearer.
(c) Individual viruses will make it all the way through the mask’s fiber gauntlet.
(d) no need to wear mask if non- symptomatic; mucus and saliva destroy the latent viruses (released through talking or breathing) of the symptomatic.***

The deception regarding the efficacy of the N95 mask is breathtaking:

The COVID-19 virus itself is indeed smaller than the N95 filter size, but the virus always travels attached to larger particles that are consistently snared by the filter. And even if the particles were smaller than the N95 filter size, the erratic motion of particles that size and the electrostatic attraction generated by the mask means they would be consistently caught as well.

Firstly, a viral droplet is not a particle, it is a loose collection of viruses held together by mucus and saliva, ranging in number of between 30,000 - 100,000 viruses, ejected from the lungs by coughing (30,000 viruses) or sneezing (100,000 viruses). Secondly, no matter the efficacy of the mask's electrostatic charged fibers, nor the erratic motion of particles the size of individual viruses, hundreds of individual viruses will still break loose and make it through the mask's internal protective gauntlet, thereby infecting the wearer. 

(3) Symptomatic Mask Wearers:

Dangerous! Only to be worn for a short period of time:

(a) the body's mechanism for defeating the flu is through coughing and sneezing, but now the droplets associated with such convulsions, each convulsion associated with between 30,000 - 100,000 viruses, will be trapped in the mask and re-breathed back into the nasal passage/lungs, leading to (i) pneumonia; and (ii) brain infection by the infection of the olfactory nerves in the nasal passage, these nerves traveling directly into the brain to the olfactory bulb.

Conclusion:



Bacterial and Viral Growth On Mask

Another danger with wearing masks is they become moistened, allowing for the growth of [drug resistant] bacteria if the mask is worn too long:

But Dr. Colin Furness, an infection control epidemiologist and assistant professor at the University of Toronto, says wearing a mask can be dangerous. That is if the wrong mask is worn, it's worn incorrectly or people have incorrect expectations when wearing it. 

"The worst one is wearing one for too long," he said, noting masks can collect bacteria and other viruses.

Furness said he wonders why this information isn't being shared when there is evidence about it.

Study points to dangers

He said a study in a U.K. medical journal showed health-care workers who wore cloth masks all day while working were 13 times more likely to get a respiratory illness when compared to the standard practice of only wearing a mask when necessary. 

Those who wore a paper or procedure mask were twice as likely to get some type of respiratory infection if they wore it all day. The N95 masks were only worn when required during the study and no staff were affected. 

"This shouldn't surprise us," Furness said. "A mask, you're breathing on it all day long creating all this wonderful space for bacteria to multiply, and once they get to a certain quantity you start inhaling them."

He said drug-resistant bacteria could be worse than COVID-19 for some people.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Popular posts from this blog