Wednesday, July 1, 2020

'George and Derek', A New Sitcom Coming This Fall To the Communist Broadcasting System

Why is everyone pretending that George and Derek aren't friends, doing security together at the El Nuevo Rodeo club on Lake Street? The media has spiked the story that the two worked with each other at the club, and Derek has refused to admit the association, informing us that George is a police informant.

That informs us of the Marxist 'false opposition' fake 'conservative' media, hand-in-hand with these false flag operations the Marxist mainstream media regurgitates, the purpose being to cement racial animosity, the ultimate purpose being the "abolition of religion", and the destruction of those civilizations "whose spiritual aroma is religion".*

By the way, how does someone with a violent criminal record get to be doing night club security work with police officers! He gets the gig because the criminal is a police informer:

“The head of the Minneapolis police union says George Floyd’s “violent criminal history” needs to be remembered and that the protests over his death are the work of a “terrorist movement.”

“What is not being told is the violent criminal history of George Floyd. The media will not air this,” police union president Bob Kroll told his members in a letter posted Monday on Twitter.

Floyd had landed five years behind bars in 2009 for an assault and robbery two years earlier, and before that, had been convicted of charges ranging from theft with a firearm to drugs, the Daily Mail reported.”


CONTRADICTIONS AND HILARIOUS BACKTRACKING

El Nuevo Rodeo club owner, Maya Santamaria, caught in a lie, where in early reports she says Derek only worked outside the club, therefore Derek didn’t know George who worked inside the club, "Chauvin was our off-duty police for almost the entirety of the 17 years that we were open" Santamaria said. "They were working together at the same time, it's just that Chauvin worked outside and the security guards were inside." But another club security employee, David Pinney, says Derek worked inside the club, “Derek [was] extremely aggressive within the club with some of the patrons, which was an issue.”

Maya Santamaria caught in another lie where she’s reported saying both Derek and George worked together up to the end of the year (2019), “A former club owner in south Minneapolis says the now-fired police officer and the black man who died in his custody this week both worked security for her club up to the end of last year.” But now the story has changed, where David Pinney details “several interactions he said occurred between Floyd and Chauvin, claiming the duo worked together for up to six months in late 2015 and early 2016.”

Then Maya Santamaria plants both feet into the manure, inadvertently incriminating herself as a racist enabler by allowing Derek for seventeen yeas to abuse Blacks, “I told him I thought this is unnecessary to be pepper-sprayed. The knee-jerk reaction of being afraid, it seemed overkill,” Santamaria said. “It was a concern and I did voice my opinion, but police officers have a way of justifying what they do.”

Naturally, of course, Maya never spoke to Derek about breaking up fights between Blacks who were fighting, but the lie has caught her as a ‘racist enabler’ in this race-based false flag drama. If Derek had been abusing anyone at the club, he would have been fired, not working at the club for seventeen years until the club closed in December 2019.

Then David Pinney took back an account that George and Derek knew each other well within the club. Why was this account changed? Because “she [Maya Santamaria] did not have a close relationship with him [George] as I did”. Huh? Pinney recants his account of both George and Derek knowing each other well, where Pinney says Derek was aggressive towards George, because Maya Santamaria did not know George well? That makes no sense, and tells us Pinney spoke off script, tripping over the truth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Karl Marx (1843)

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion."

...and...

"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions."

...and...

"It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world."

Now you know what Marxists are referring to when they utter the phrase, "The Struggle"...

"The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.